explorerfere.blogg.se

1. #VIRUS BARRIER VS CLAMXAV FOR MAC#
2. #VIRUS BARRIER VS CLAMXAV GENERATOR#
3. #VIRUS BARRIER VS CLAMXAV SOFTWARE#
4. #VIRUS BARRIER VS CLAMXAV PC#

I have tried several solutions, none work very well. We do a lot of communication with our membership via E-mail. We are constantly plagued by a Word virus. (I still have my Centris and have even aquired an SE30).We are a small non-profit (church) with an Apple Mini server. Intel PCs have become a commodity ware whilst Apple, having invested in its operating system and device design is still making products that people want to own and use (for ages) and even collect. Now that Apple is using Intel chips and USB is common the price differential has almost gone.

#VIRUS BARRIER VS CLAMXAV PC#

SCSI was excellent and it wasn't long ago that Intel owners were puting SCSI controllers into there multi-storey PC towers.

Macs used to be much more expensive because the components were far superior to those used in PCs and were actually compatible with each other. Work (PhD lab): Apple Macs (IIfx, IIVX, IICi ,SE30 etc)Īnd they're both still working perfectly today.so there's no looking back for me now. Home: Apple Mac Centris 610 (got the education discount) Really really wanted a Mac but they cost 3 times more than Intel machines, which were themselves well out of reach. Uni: Honeywell mainframe with "dumb" terminals Home:Amiga 500 (using motorola 68000 chip) My personal computer ownership looks like this: Then there all those old figures in MacDraw. I became true love when I saw cricket graph in action plot something and print it our on a daisywheel printer in a few minutes, when i would have taken 20 minutes with my pencil, ruler and graph paper.īTW, I still have cricket graph and cricket graph III lurking in my OS9 application folder. Your experience sounds much like mine, I became a Mac user when my roommate upgraded his Apple II to a Mac (or was it Mac+? - too long ago). I hope with running windows on a modern Mac we manage to stay as free of viruses as in former times!

Maybe I'll keep a G-5 around for some years, just to access old data and programs.

I'm currently shifting to all-Intel Mac, and lament the demise of old favorite Classic Mac programs.

#VIRUS BARRIER VS CLAMXAV SOFTWARE#

Now, it appears the capability to run windows on the new Intel Macs has brought down the last barrier - the need to use pc-based software on certain scientific machines, etc.

#VIRUS BARRIER VS CLAMXAV FOR MAC#

Must admit I haven't really used a pc, and can only say (like others in this thread) those frustrated shouts at the computer are much less frequent for Mac users than those I've heard from pc users. My first computer was an Apple and once Mac came on the scene I never looked back. I wanted to know what dose scientist prefer to work with a PC or a Mac.Īs an anatomist interested in graphics capabilities, Mac has always been the hands-down best choice. If you aren't as lazy as me, and don't have any problems shutting down all your MAc windows/workflows/browsers etc when you want to use your program, BootCAmp is a very viable option - it devotes >90% of system resources to Windows. the terrible VirtualPC), but actually RUNS the OS - except it does so with adaptable software restricted hardware limits.

#VIRUS BARRIER VS CLAMXAV GENERATOR#

I run Windows-only density mapping, confocal 3D generator and flow cytometry software on my iMAc without any trouble or lag - and the overall user experience is undoubtedly better than a PC with similar specs.Īs far as I can make out, Parallels DOES NOT run as an emulator (e.g. I have not however looked into whether you can now run pClamp 10 in MAC or in a Windows Parrallels system on a MACĪll my programs seem to run natively - I've assigned 1 Gb of RAM (out of 2 Gb) to Parallels/Windows, and that is usually quite enough. Like Tony I begrudgingly use a PC mainly because the pClamp electrophysioogy software is so intimately tied to the PC operating systems.